Abstracta
A software testing company focused on quality engineering, performance and automation.
- Location
- San Francisco, United States
- Founded
- 2008
An editorial guide to established qa testing companies, selected for relevant services, specialization, public work and market presence.
Ranked using public company information, specialization, client feedback and market presence.
A software testing company focused on quality engineering, performance and automation.
An international services provider supporting game development, art, testing, localization and player support.
A game development and external production group spanning art, engineering, QA and creative services.
A quality engineering company providing testing, automation and assurance services.
A software testing company combining a managed freelance network with a testing platform.
A software testing service focused on automated end-to-end test coverage.
A digital assurance and quality engineering company, part of Coforge.
A quality engineering and software testing services provider.
A digital quality company using a global testing community for real-world product validation.
A crowdtesting platform for functional, localization and user-experience testing.
| Company | Headquarters | Founded | Selected services | Technology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abstracta | San Francisco, United States | 2008 | Quality engineering, Performance testing | Automation, Performance testing |
| Keywords Studios | Dublin, Ireland | 1998 | Co-development, Game art | Multi-engine production, Console platforms |
| Room 8 Group | Limassol, Cyprus | 2011 | Co-development, Game art | Unity, Unreal Engine |
| Qualitest | London, United Kingdom | 1997 | Quality engineering, Test automation | Automation frameworks, AI testing |
| Testlio | Austin, United States | 2012 | Managed testing, Mobile testing | Test management, Device testing |
Factbase considers relevant services, technology expertise, years in business, public portfolios, client feedback and geographic reach. Rankings are editorial judgments, not mathematically objective scores.
Read the full methodology →We revisit category pages when material public information changes and date each report so readers can judge its freshness.
No. Commercial relationships do not determine editorial order. Any future sponsored placement would be labeled clearly.
Yes. A short discovery conversation with two or three relevant teams is usually the clearest way to compare working style, scope and cost.